<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EasySoft&#039;s Blog &#187; hud settlements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.easysoft-usa.com/blog/tag/hud-settlements/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.easysoft-usa.com/blog</link>
	<description>Tech Talk on Legal Billing Softwares</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RESPA Final Rule and a Lender’s Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.easysoft-usa.com/blog/legal-software/real-estate-closing/respa-final-rules-and-lenders-perspective.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.easysoft-usa.com/blog/legal-software/real-estate-closing/respa-final-rules-and-lenders-perspective.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Kabra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Closing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 respa rules implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hud settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respa 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respa changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respa reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respa rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpeasysoft/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RESPA rule implementation details for 2010. Details about 2009 RESPA changes.
 <a href="http://www.easysoft-usa.com/blog/legal-software/real-estate-closing/respa-final-rules-and-lenders-perspective.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On  Nov 11, 2009, I attended the Real Property Section of the Essex County  Bar Association (ECBA) New Jersey meeting on “2009 RESPA Changes.”  Darcie Gore of Bank of America (BoA) was one of the guest speakers and  John R. Dusinberre, Esq of ECBA was the moderator.</p>
<p>After  giving 50 or so presentations myself about RESPA Rule implementation  for settlement agents, it was nice to sit back and listen. It was also  interesting to see a leading lender’s perspective, plans and guidance.  Here’s my take from the meeting:</p>
<p>» BoA’s go-live date for new GFE is January 1, 2010.</p>
<p>• Talk about going down to the wire.</p>
<p>» BoA wants settlement agents to submit a draft HUD for approval one-week prior to closing, so they can<br />
carefully review all fees prior to loan funding.</p>
<p>• Interestingly, a draft HUD prepared a week ahead may not even have closing figures. Settlement agents<br />
typically don’t receive their final closing figures until the day of the closing.</p>
<p>» BoA will make list of “lender identified service providers” (for the purpose of tolerances computation) online.</p>
<p>• This seems problematic to me. First, RESPA rules require a list of service providers be given as an<br />
attachment “along with” the Good Faith Estimate (GFE.)</p>
<p>• Secondly, an online list will continue to be refined/updated, surely a nightmare for settlement agents<br />
preparing a HUD. So, this will need further clarification from BoA.</p>
<p>» If any last minute repair issues are discovered during the final walk-through, BoA will have to be notified as<br />
they will need to determine if the repair charges result in changed circumstances.</p>
<p>• A final walk-through happens the day before the closing. It seems impractical to close an entire loop for<br />
minor repair work just hours before the closing.</p>
<p>• Unless major issues are discovered, it seems like agreeing to a repair payment with a third party and<br />
showing it on the HUD with the seller incurring charges, would be the most appropriate.</p>
<p>» BoA has set up a dedicated toll-free hot-line number and email to address any compliance related issues.</p>
<p>»  Because New Jersey is an attorney closing state, there was lot of  discussion about how to record attorneys’ fees. John Dusinbere presented  an approach separating fees on 1102 (the portion pertaining to  conducting closing) and 1109 (the portion pertaining to other legal  services). His method is in close alignment with our position at Easy  Soft, which we’ve been advocating for almost a year for our customers.  (I’ll address “recording attorneys’ fees” in an up-coming blog post.)</p>
<p>»  BoA considers the 1102 charge as one that affects the APR calculations,  but they have not taken a position on the other legal services charge  (likely on 1109) and whether it also affects the APR. Remember, the  Mortgage Disclosure Improvement Act (MDIA) that went into effect July  30, 2009 requires a new Truth in Lending (TIL) disclosure statement be  issued if the APR rises by more than 0.125% and starts a new 7-day  waiting period. So, this can get tricky very quickly!</p>
<p>The  Essex County Bar meeting was a strong indicator of the on-going issues  residential real estate attorneys, title companies, closing companies  and lenders still have to iron out before January 1, 2010.</p>
<p>In  August, Easy Soft began offering webinars to help real estate industry  professionals get ready for RESPA reform. We continue to offer our two  popular RESPA webinars each week and invite you to attend. More details  at: <a href="http://www.easysoft-usa.com/hud-software.html">http://www.easysoft-usa.com/hud-software.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.easysoft-usa.com/blog/legal-software/real-estate-closing/respa-final-rules-and-lenders-perspective.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

